Product Code Database
Example Keywords: angry birds -skirt $92
   » » Wiki: Legendary Creature
Tag Wiki 'Legendary Creature'.
Tag

Legendary creature
 (

 C O N T E N T S 

A legendary creature is a type of entity that is described in (including and ), and may be featured in historical accounts before , but has not been scientifically shown to exist.

In the , monstrous creatures such as the and the appear in tales for the protagonist to destroy. Other creatures, such as the , were claimed in accounts of by various scholars of antiquity.

(1984). 9780520051928, University of California Press. .
(2026). 9780192100191, Oxford University Press. .
Some legendary creatures are hybrid beasts or Chimeras.

Some legendary creatures originated in traditional and were believed to be real creatures—for example, , and unicorns. Others are based on real encounters or garbled accounts of travellers' tales, such as the Vegetable Lamb of Tartary, a sheeplike animal which supposedly grew tethered to the earth.

(2026). 9780881926309, Timber Press, Incorporated. .


Creatures
A variety of mythical animals appear in the art and stories of the . For example, in the , monstrous creatures include the , and for the hero to confront. Other tales include to be defeated by , the (human/bull) to be destroyed by , and the Hydra to be killed by , while battles with the . These thus have the basic function of emphasizing the greatness of the involved.Grimal, Pierre. The Dictionary of Classical Mythology. Blackwell Reference, 1986.Sabin, Frances E. Classical Myths That Live Today. Silver Burdett Company, 1940.

Some classical era creatures, such as the (horse/human) , chimaera, Triton and the , are found also in . Similarly, appear as winged lions in Indian art and the of North America.

(1985). 9780391032873, Abhinav Publications. .

In , animals, both real and mythical, played important roles. These included decorative forms as in medieval jewellery, sometimes with their limbs intricately interlaced. Animal forms were used to add humor or majesty to objects. In , animals carried symbolic meanings, where for example the lamb symbolized Christ, a dove indicated the , and the classical represented a guardian of the dead. Medieval bestiaries included animals regardless of biological reality; the represented the , while the symbolised temptation.


Allegory
One function of mythical animals in the Middle Ages was . Unicorns, for example, were described as extraordinarily swift and uncatchable by traditional methods.Gravestock, Pamela. "Did Imaginary Animals Exist?" In The Mark of the Beast: The Medieval Bestiary in Art, Life, and Literature. New York: Garland. 1999. It was believed that the only way for one to catch this beast was to lead a virgin to its dwelling. Then, the unicorn was supposed to leap into her lap and go to sleep, at which point a hunter could finally capture it. In terms of symbolism, the unicorn was a metaphor for Christ. Unicorns represented the idea of innocence and purity. In the King James Bible, Psalm 92:10 states, "My horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of a unicorn." This is because the translators of the King James erroneously translated the Hebrew word re'em as unicorn. Later versions translate this as wild ox.J. L. Schrader. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, New Series, Vol. 44, No. 1, "A Medieval Bestiary" (Summer, 1986), pp. 1+12–55, 17. The unicorn's small size signifies the humility of Christ.

Another common legendary creature that served allegorical functions within the Middle Ages was the . Dragons were identified with serpents, though their attributes were greatly intensified. The dragon was supposed to have been larger than all other animals. It was believed that the dragon had no harmful poison but was able to slay anything it embraced without any need for venom. Biblical scriptures speak of the dragon in reference to the devil, and they were used to denote sin in general during the Middle Ages. Dragons were said to have dwelled in places like Ethiopia and India, based on the idea that there was always heat present in these locations.

Physical detail was not the central focus of the artists depicting such animals, and medieval bestiaries were not conceived as biological categorizations. Creatures like the unicorn and griffin were not categorized in a separate "mythological" section in medieval bestiaries,Flores, Nona C., "The Mirror of Nature Distorted: The Medieval Artist's Dilemma in Depicting Animals". In The Medieval World of Nature. New York: Garland. 1993. as the symbolic implications were of primary importance. Animals we know to have existed were still presented with a fantastical approach. It seems the religious and moral implications of animals were far more significant than matching a physical likeness in these renderings. Nona C. Flores explains, "By the tenth century, artists were increasingly bound by allegorical interpretation, and abandoned naturalistic depictions."


See also
  • Fearsome critters
  • Lists of legendary creatures
  • List of legendary creatures by type
  • List of cryptids
  • Non-physical entity


External links
Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
2s Time